Quanta magazine

Not the actual death of the magazine, just someone getting upset about lack of depth in an article, quanta magazine. They simulated some aspects of wormhole dynamics under the crucial assumption that the holographic correspondence of the Sachdev—Ye—Kitaev quanta magazine holds. I seriously doubt that many of it's readers have sufficiently deep knowledge of QC to properly understand the Sachdev—Ye—Kitaev model.

Quantum algorithms can find their way out of mazes exponentially faster than classical ones, at the cost of forgetting the paths they took. A chemical trick for making oxygen can sustain whole underground ecosystems. In steganography, an ordinary message masks the presence of a secret communication. Melanie Mitchell says digital minds will never truly be like ours until they can make analogies. The physicist and computer scientist Stephanie Wehner is planning and designing the next internet—a quantum one. Quantum computers are improving at a doubly exponential rate.

Quanta magazine

Illuminating basic science and math research through public service journalism. Quanta Magazine is an editorially independent online publication launched by the Simons Foundation to enhance public understanding of science. Why Quanta? The best traditional news organizations provide excellent reporting on applied areas of science such as health, medicine, technology, engineering and the environment. We strive to complement and augment existing media coverage. Our work often resembles journalistic alchemy — we mash together the complexities of science with the malleable art of storytelling in an attempt to forge a precious new alloy. It can be a mind-bending enterprise, but we relish the challenge. At Quanta Magazine, scientific accuracy is every bit as important as telling a good story. Since Quanta is a nonprofit foundation-funded publication, all of its resources go toward producing responsible, freely accessible journalism that is meticulously researched, reported, edited, copy-edited and fact-checked. And our editorial independence ensures the impartiality of our science coverage — our articles do not reflect or represent the views of the Simons Foundation. The decision to cover a particular researcher or research result is made solely on editorial grounds in service of our audience. Apple Podcasts Preview. View on Apple Podcasts.

Xcelerate on Dec 2, parent next [—]. Subscribe Now You may cancel at any time. Simons Foundation.

Quanta Magazine is an editorially independent [1] online publication of the Simons Foundation covering developments in physics , mathematics , biology and computer science. Undark Magazine described Quanta Magazine as "highly regarded for its masterful coverage of complex topics in science and math. The articles in the magazine are freely available to read online. Quanta Magazine was initially launched as Simons Science News [8] in October , but it was renamed to its current title in July Contents move to sidebar hide. Article Talk.

Send feedback. Quanta Science Podcast. Listen to Quanta Magazine's in-depth news stories about developments in mathematics, theoretical physics, theoretical computer science and the basic life sciences. Quanta, an editorially independent magazine published by the Simons Foundation, seeks to enhance public understanding of basic research. Read more at QuantaMagazine.

Quanta magazine

Listen to Quanta Magazine's in-depth news stories about developments in mathematics, theoretical physics, theoretical computer science and the basic life sciences. Quanta, an editorially independent magazine published by the Simons Foundation, seeks to enhance public understanding of basic research. Read more at QuantaMagazine. You've learned from Quanta.

Old navy robes

Download as PDF Printable version. Every magazine and newspaper leaves a stinker occasionally. Edit: Just to be clear, I'm not disputing that the Quanta article is factually deficient - although I don't have the relevant specialist knowledge to understand why. Undark Magazine described Quanta Magazine as "highly regarded for its masterful coverage of complex topics in science and math. Illuminating basic science and math research through public service journalism. Not the actual death of the magazine, just someone getting upset about lack of depth in an article. I have been generally impressed with quanta, as they usually try very hard far more than most of their genre to actually report accurately. Moreover, either editors are asleep at the wheel for allowing the practice and or they're under commercial pressures to print such crap—profit being more important than science news. Psychology Today. A bit more precisely, the correspondence relates the partition functions of quantum gravity in AdS with the partition functions of conformal fields. Neither animal, plant, fungus nor familiar protozoan, a strange microbe foretells incredible biodiversity yet to be discovered. Because the only way to accurately talk about quantum physics is to show the math and only talk about that. I'll be honest. All popular articles about quantum physics are in a way bullshit, false and misrepresentation. Not to be confused with Quanta journal.

Illuminating basic science and math research through public service journalism.

This is exactly how I interpreted that part of the video [1], and it makes me feel sad because Quanta is the only kinda pop-science magazine I enjoy reading. As with all tabloid journalism, the caveats are at the end where you find out the "bridge principle" from QC-to-Wormhole requires assumptions that are non-physical. I am beginning to think that advertising is the most toxic element of our environment. The paper is still there on the Nature website. National Geographic. NotYourLawyer on Dec 2, prev next [—]. Of course we are not ants and we can survive even when our systems of collaboration are destroyed. All popular articles about quantum physics are in a way bullshit, false and misrepresentation. In steganography, an ordinary message masks the presence of a secret communication. The "it's dead to me because of this one bad article" standard will leave one with no magazines and no newspapers that are worthy. Moreover, either editors are asleep at the wheel for allowing the practice and or they're under commercial pressures to print such crap—profit being more important than science news.