Kelsey piper ai

Good agreed; more recently, so did Stephen Hawking. These concerns predate the founding of any of the current labs building frontier AI, and the historical trajectory of these concerns is important kelsey piper ai making sense of our present-day situation. To the extent that frontier labs do focus on safety, kelsey piper ai, it is in large part due to advocacy by researchers who do not hold any financial stake in AI.

She explores wide-ranging topics from climate change to artificial intelligence, from vaccine development to factory farms. She writes the Future Perfect newsletter, which you can subscribe to here. She occasionally tweets at kelseytuoc and occasionally writes for the quarterly magazine Asterisk. If you have story ideas, questions, tips, or other info relevant to her work, you can email kelsey. She can also accept confidential tips on Signal at Ethics Statement Future Perfect coverage may include stories about organizations that writers have made personal donations to.

Kelsey piper ai

That might have people asking: Wait, what? But these grand worries are rooted in research. Along with Hawking and Musk, prominent figures at Oxford and UC Berkeley and many of the researchers working in AI today believe that advanced AI systems, if deployed carelessly, could permanently cut off human civilization from a good future. This concern has been raised since the dawn of computing. There are also skeptics. Others are worried that excessive hype about the power of their field might kill it prematurely. And even among the people who broadly agree that AI poses unique dangers, there are varying takes on what steps make the most sense today. Unfortunately, I don't have time to re-read them or say very nuanced things about them. I think this is an accessible intro to why we should care about AI safety. I'm not sure if it's the best intro, but it seems like a contender. Hide table of contents. The case for taking AI seriously as a threat to humanity Kelsey Piper. Oct 15 1 min read 1. AI safety Frontpage. Read the rest of the article.

By Kelsey Piper November 29, Some people think that all existing AI research agendas will kill us.

GPT-4 can pass the bar exam in the 90th percentile, while the previous model struggled around in the 10th percentile. And on the advanced sommelier theory test, GPT-4 performed better than 77 percent of test-takers. These are stunning results — not just what the model can do, but the rapid pace of progress. Her work is informed by her deep knowledge of the handful of companies that arguably have the most influence over the future of A. This episode contains strong language. Tolkien Thoughts?

Stephanie Sy Stephanie Sy. Layla Quran Layla Quran. In recent months, new artificial intelligence tools have garnered attention, and concern, over their ability to produce original work. The creations range from college-level essays to computer code and works of art. As Stephanie Sy reports, this technology could change how we live and work in profound ways. Notice: Transcripts are machine and human generated and lightly edited for accuracy.

Kelsey piper ai

The short version of a big conversation about the dangers of emerging technology. Tech superstars like Elon Musk , AI pioneers like Alan Turing , top computer scientists like Stuart Russell , and emerging-technologies researchers like Nick Bostrom have all said they think artificial intelligence will transform the world — and maybe annihilate it. We continually discover ways we can extend our existing approaches to let computers do new, exciting, increasingly general things, like winning at open-ended war strategy games. Current AI systems frequently exhibit unintended behavior. As AI systems get more powerful, unintended behavior may become less charming and more dangerous. Experts have argued that powerful AI systems, whatever goals we give them, are likely to have certain predictable behavior patterns. For all those reasons, many researchers have said AI is similar to launching a rocket. Sign up for the Future Perfect newsletter. Will you help keep Vox free for all? Support our mission and help keep Vox free for all by making a financial contribution to Vox today.

Iphone fondos de pantalla con movimiento

They point to self-driving cars , which are still mediocre under the best conditions despite the billions that have been poured into making them work. Reddit Pocket Flipboard Email. In the last 10 years, rapid progress in deep learning produced increasingly powerful AI systems — and hopes that systems more powerful still might be within reach. As with Open Philanthropy, many of these techniques depend on training less powerful AIs to help supervise increasingly more powerful systems. Good agreed; more recently, so did Stephen Hawking. The Oscars Supreme Court Winter warming. Unfortunately, I don't have time to re-read them or say very nuanced things about them. Yudkowsky and those who hold this belief tend to think that intelligence — in entities both artificial and biological — has a critical point — call it generalization, or coherence, or reflectivity, or the thing that separates humans from chimpanzees. To play chess, they programmed in heuristics about chess. Curated and popular this week. While once we treated computer vision as a completely different problem from natural language processing or platform game playing, now we can solve all three problems with the same approaches. The more control humans choose to retain over things like the supply chains that produce microchips, the harder it will be for AI to defeat us.

GPT-4 can pass the bar exam in the 90th percentile, while the previous model struggled around in the 10th percentile.

Rather, they come from the disconnect between what we tell our systems to do and what we actually want them to do. Guest suggestions? There are only a few people who work full time on AI forecasting. GPT-4 can pass the bar exam in the 90th percentile, while the previous model struggled around in the 10th percentile. AI safety Frontpage. If superintelligent AIs outnumber humans, think faster than humans, and are deeply integrated into every aspect of the economy, an AI takeover seems plausible — even if they never become smarter than we are. If you have story ideas, questions, tips, or other info relevant to her work, you can email kelsey. But now, the same approach produces fake news or music depending on what training data it is fed. Future Perfect is supported in part by grants from foundations and individual donors. The case that AI could pose an existential risk to humanity is more complicated and harder to grasp. In reality, they might not disagree as profoundly as you would think. Email required.