Hyundai i20 active safety rating

The tested model of Hyundai i20 was introduced in Australia during

The Hyundai i20 was introduced in Australia and New Zealand in This ANCAP 5 star safety rating applies to all i20 variants built from when 6 airbags became standard. Australasian specifications may vary and therefore models sold in Australasia might provide different levels of protection to those described on this page. Dual frontal, side chest and side head airbags curtains are standard. Advanced seat belt reminders are fitted to all seats. A full list of safety features and technologies can be viewed within the Technical Report see download link.

Hyundai i20 active safety rating

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Hyundai showed that, on the passenger's side, a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. However, on the driver's side, structures in the dashboard were considered a risk to occupants' legs and a penalty was applied to the score. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the car would be a benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of the rear dummy was rated as weak, based on compression of the chest, but protection was otherwise good or adequate. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points in this part of the assessment. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate. The car is not equipped with a counter-measure to mitigate occupant to occupant injuries in the event of a side impact. Mitigation of the extent to which a body would be thrown to the opposite side of a car in a lateral collision was rated as poor. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The car is equipped with an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, and with MCB, a system which applies the brakes after a collision to reduce the likelihood of secondary impacts.

The car is equipped with an advanced eCall system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash, and with MCB, a system which applies the brakes after a collision to reduce the likelihood of secondary impacts.

Compared to the previous-gen model, the i20 gets lesser adult occupancy score, but has stepped up in child occupancy protection. By Saptarshi Mondal. Share -. Both Hyundai models have scored an average 3-star safety rating for both, adult and child occupancy. As is the norm at GNCAP crash tests, the model tested was the entry-level variant, which means it comes equipped with two airbags, ABS and front seatbelt warning as standard.

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and front passenger. Hyundai showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different statures and to those sat in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test the restraint systems provided adequate protection to the driver's chest and to the rear passenger's neck and chest, and good protection to other body regions. In both the side impact barrier test and the side pole test, dummy readings showed good protection for all critical body areas. However, during both tests, the rear edge of the curtain airbag was trapped by part of the interior trim so did not fully deploy as intended.

Hyundai i20 active safety rating

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Hyundai showed that, on the passenger's side, a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. However, on the driver's side, structures in the dashboard were considered a risk to occupants' legs and a penalty was applied to the score.

Youtube nursery poem

Occupant Interaction. What is Hyundai Exter Safety Rating? Sign-up for the latest ratings and news. How is the performance of Hyundai i20 Active? Rescue and Extrication 2. India has never been a place for crossover until a decade back. Approaching a slower moving car. In the side barrier impact, protection of the head of the 10 year dummy was adequate but that of the chest was rated as poor on the basis of accelerations measured during the test. Pelvis Impact 6. Does Hyundai i20 Active have key-less entry feature? Need an expert opinion on your car and bike related queries? Adult Occupant. Mitigation of the extent to which a body would be thrown to the opposite side of a car in a lateral collision was rated as poor.

Safety and reliability is another area where the Hyundai i20 scores strongly.

By vishal bishnoi. In the full-width rigid barrier test the restraint systems provided adequate protection to the driver's chest and to the rear passenger's neck and chest, and good protection to other body regions. Does Hyundai i20 Active have ventilated seats? Compare with i20 Active. The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed but was mostly rated as between marginal and good. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. Leg Impact 6. Your vehicle safety questions, answered! What are the engine specifications of Hyundai i20 Active? Images Videos Hyundai i20 facelift image gallery Views 10 months ago. Ask Now. In the side barrier impact, protection of the head of the 10 year dummy was adequate but that of the chest was rated as poor on the basis of accelerations measured during the test.