Gravity movie mistakes
This article is a list of all the inaccuracies in Gravity. While it's true that the film is very scientifically accurate; even down to the star patterns in space, some liberties were made to sustain the story, leading to some minor yet rather glaring inaccuracies, gravity movie mistakes.
Sign In Sign In. New Customer? Create account. Explorer is in a spin due to debris impacts. When Stone travels back to Explorer, it is seen almost stable. When arriving at Explorer, it is spinning fast again.
Gravity movie mistakes
Clooney's speed should be very close to Bullocks' and the ISS', hence. The parachute ropes should be able to withhold the forces of deceleration the mass of two people is very small, compared to Soyus or ISS , so no more pulling or having to sacrifice himself This is due to the fact that there's no drag in space to constantly change Clooney's velocity revert to Newton's First Law. Suggested correction: The parachute ropes are of course strong enough to hold the relatively low kinetic energy of the drifting astronauts, but that is not the reason why Clooney detaches. The rope is not attached firmly to Bullocks' leg. There are some loops loosely wrapped around her leg, and while both astronauts are still drifting away from the ISS seen in a shot a few seconds earlier , those loops slip away from the foot one by one. Before the last loop slips away from the foot, untethering and condemning both astronauts, Clooney detaches himself to lessen the kinetec energy that pulls on the rope by reducing the total mass of the "system of two astronauts", so that there is a better chance that the last loop will remain attached to Bullock. Once Clooney had stop moving all that would have been need was a slight pull from Bullock to pull him towards her. The momentum was lost when he stopped moving. So no need to cut himself loose. It all happens in free fall. As soon as the cord withstood inertia resulting from George's body mass pulling on it, George would bounce back towards Sandra. The entire scene was completely unrealistic. Clooney stopped moving in relation to Bullock. But both were still moving in relation to the ISS look at the scene again; there is a wide shot that establishes this , with both their masses pulling on the parachute cords, straining the tenuous connection of the cords looped around Bullock's foot.
And, even if all this failed, why did Clooney think it was such a stupid idea that she go get the Soyuz and come pick him up? This list is by no means extensive though, so if you spot anything we missed then post gravity movie mistakes in the comments.
Hi everyone, Gravity has been bothering me a lot since I watched it in theaters last year, in particular some of the factual issues regarding the Kessler syndrome we observed the characters going through. I don't understand how that's possible, because everyone knows that orbital period in LEO is once every 90 minutes, that means that the debris must have been stationary over earth as in, net velocity of ZERO and the orbiter was flying through it.. If the satellite was in a retrograde orbit, wouldn't they run into the debris once every 45 minutes?? Does anybody have an explanation for this or any other factual errors that we have not been made aware of yet regarding this film? PS: Please don't reply with the classic "it's a movie" response. If you are going to advertise a film as being realistic, people are allowed to scrutinize its authenticity of that claim till the day they day. Gravity deserves to be picked apart on a factual level because of this claim, no matter how much audiences enjoyed it.
Clooney's speed should be very close to Bullocks' and the ISS', hence. The parachute ropes should be able to withhold the forces of deceleration the mass of two people is very small, compared to Soyus or ISS , so no more pulling or having to sacrifice himself This is due to the fact that there's no drag in space to constantly change Clooney's velocity revert to Newton's First Law. Suggested correction: The parachute ropes are of course strong enough to hold the relatively low kinetic energy of the drifting astronauts, but that is not the reason why Clooney detaches. The rope is not attached firmly to Bullocks' leg. There are some loops loosely wrapped around her leg, and while both astronauts are still drifting away from the ISS seen in a shot a few seconds earlier , those loops slip away from the foot one by one. Before the last loop slips away from the foot, untethering and condemning both astronauts, Clooney detaches himself to lessen the kinetec energy that pulls on the rope by reducing the total mass of the "system of two astronauts", so that there is a better chance that the last loop will remain attached to Bullock.
Gravity movie mistakes
This article is a list of all the inaccuracies in Gravity. While it's true that the film is very scientifically accurate; even down to the star patterns in space, some liberties were made to sustain the story, leading to some minor yet rather glaring inaccuracies. For more information, See the full article.
Runyons fine furniture photos
Plot holes. These tones are obsolete and haven't been used for many years. As they were seen above the atmosphere, they should not twinkle. Although not certain, some are convinced that there will come a point in future when Earth orbit is so crowded that a Kessler syndrome-like event will be guaranteed to occur. However, we like to think that maybe, as this was a hypothetical future Shuttle mission that never happened STS if we remember correctly; the last was actually STS in July , then maybe , in this crazy future orbit-friendly timeline, NASA decided to try and move things like Hubble and the ISS closer together in Earth orbit. During re-entry, debris is shown zooming past the capsule. As soon as the cord withstood inertia resulting from George's body mass pulling on it, George would bounce back towards Sandra. Rather than using the medium as a gimmick, 'Gravity' uses it to depict a real environment that is completely alien to most people. Simply talking both-ways like using a mobile phone is not possible. As the commander of a Space Shuttle, Kowalski would have the rank equivalent to colonel. There, fixed it. The only "big" mistakes with the movie were that the Hubble, ISS and Tiangong were in similar orbits Inaccuracies in Gravity. Wiki Content. No character in this film ever wears theirs.
By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. The New York Times pointed out a key problem involving the vast distance the astronauts manage to travel in a relatively short period of time after their shuttle is destroyed in a hail of debris.
Kowalski pronounces Soyuz differently depending on when he says it. Upvote valid corrections to help move entries into the corrections section. Only the training simulator module does. Factual errors. The rope is not attached firmly to Bullocks' leg. Character error. Latest blog posts Biggest movie mistakes of 26 shark movie mistakes The biggest mistakes of The biggest mistakes of The Biggest Movie Mistakes of the Decade Stan Lee's best cameos The 20 biggest mistakes in The Wizard of Oz 18 bits of trivia for Toy Story movies 33 biggest mistakes in Toy Story movies 21 bits of trivia for the X-Men movies. Challenge us, teach us and heaven forbid, inspire us. I'm just frustrated that this movie was half real and half lazy. When Bullock gets out of the Soyuz spacecraft to transfer to the Tiangong-1 station she is clearly wearing a Sokol re-entry suit and not an Orlan spacewalking suit, the latter of which would let her live in space and the former of which would probably see her die pretty quickly. Astronauts are supposed to be competent, highly trained professionals that work together for months. Whilst this might be true initially, the increasing drag from the atmosphere will slow the debris but this will differ according to the size and shape of each object. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. This could not have happened in real life.
And I have faced it. We can communicate on this theme.