Apmex lawsuit

San Francisco — May 23, — Cooley successfully defended its client Liberty Coin, apmex lawsuit, a retailer specializing in precious metals, in an antitrust claims case filed in the US District Court for the Central District apmex lawsuit California, ending more than two years of litigation. In Februarya competing online reseller filed a complaint alleging Liberty Coin and multiple other sellers of coins and precious metals entered into agreements to set predatory prices for their products apmex lawsuit online in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, and had engaged in discriminatory pricing in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act, apmex lawsuit. Cooley successfully defeated three motions to dismiss, arguing that the plaintiff did not have antitrust standing, and had not plausibly pleaded a horizontal conspiracy, a plausible relevant autopilot app, that the defendants had set discriminatory prices, or that the defendants could recoup their alleged below-cost sales.

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia. Why Is My Information Online? Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. Apmex, Inc. RSS Track this Docket. Search for this case: A World Trade, Inc.

Apmex lawsuit

.

Marketing Solutions. Do not send any confidential apmex lawsuit to Cooley, as we do not have any duty to keep any information you provide to us confidential. Bauch, Jim.

.

Other - Antitrust. District Courts. California Central District Court. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Maria A. District Courts Contract CV Courts Of Appeals Other Why is this public record being published online? UniCourt uses cookies to improve your online experience, for more information please see our Privacy Policy. Search All. Search All Parties Attorneys Judges.

Apmex lawsuit

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia. Why Is My Information Online?

Stv1 text tv

In February , a competing online reseller filed a complaint alleging Liberty Coin and multiple other sellers of coins and precious metals entered into agreements to set predatory prices for their products sold online in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, and had engaged in discriminatory pricing in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Marcus D Peterson. Attachments: 1 Proposed Order Locker, Lawrence. Contact News Events Alumni Sign up. Apmex, Inc. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia. Please read this Order carefully. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Related contacts. Thrasher, Lupe. Mousavi, Amy.

If you have been looking for a reputable precious metals company, you may have wondered whether APMEX is a scam or a legit company and whether they have received online complaints.

May 23, Gayane Khechoomian. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Maria A. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction and you should not act or refrain from acting based on this content. Ryan D Lapidus. San Francisco — May 23, — Cooley successfully defended its client Liberty Coin, a retailer specializing in precious metals, in an antitrust claims case filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California, ending more than two years of litigation. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia. Related contacts. Subscribe Now. Khechoomian, Gayane. Lawrence Carl Locker. Thrasher, Lupe.